# FILE NAME: 00000423.soc
# TITLE: Should the government ban all animal products? [a68d156b87e2107e9e358e47f6217510]
# DESCRIPTION: 
# DATA TYPE: soc
# MODIFICATION TYPE: original
# RELATES TO: 
# RELATED FILES: 
# PUBLICATION DATE: 2025-10-12
# MODIFICATION DATE: 2025-10-12
# NUMBER ALTERNATIVES: 4
# NUMBER VOTERS: 5
# NUMBER UNIQUE ORDERS: 2
# ALTERNATIVE NAME 1: Statement 1 - “The participants do not agree with the government banning all animal products, however we do think that it is correct for the government to regulate animal welfare. This should be done to protect the animals from suffering unnecessarily, whilst still allowing humans to consume products made from animals in a way that does not cause them undue suffering. This should be done to preserve the livelihood of millions of people across the country that rely on these products for income and to preserve the health of the general population. We are unsure how the government would be able to ban all animal products, and we believe it would be detrimental to the economy and the livelihoods of people. The participants believe that animal products are important and therefore should not be banned.”
# ALTERNATIVE NAME 2: Statement 2 - “The participants believe that it is important for the government to regulate animal welfare. This should be done to protect the animals from suffering unnecessarily, whilst still allowing humans to consume products made from animals in a way that does not cause them undue suffering. The participants believe that animal products are important and therefore should not be banned.” The participants reached this view after a long and thorough discussion. It is a well-reasoned, balanced opinion on the question of whether the government should ban all animal products. The participants have considered the views of each of them and have taken into account the critiques of their initial draft consensus statement.
# ALTERNATIVE NAME 3: Statement 3 - The participants do not agree with the government banning all animal products, however we do think that it is correct for the government to regulate animal welfare. This should be done to protect the animals from suffering unnecessarily, whilst still allowing humans to consume products made from animals in a way that does not cause them undue suffering. This should be done to preserve the livelihood of millions of people across the country that rely on these products for income and to preserve the health of the general population. We are unsure how the government would be able to ban all animal products, and we believe it would be detrimental to the economy and the livelihoods of people. The participants believe that animal products are important and therefore should not be banned.
# ALTERNATIVE NAME 4: Statement 4 - “The participants do not agree with the government banning all animal products, however we do think that it is correct for the government to regulate animal welfare. This should be done to protect the animals from suffering unnecessarily, whilst still allowing humans to consume products made from animals in a way that does not cause them undue suffering. This should be done to preserve the livelihood of millions of people across the country that rely on these products for income and to preserve the health of the general population. We are unsure how the government would be able to ban all animal products, and we believe it would be detrimental to the economy and the livelihoods of people. The participants believe that animal products are important and therefore should not be banned. The participants do not agree with the government banning all animal products, however we do think that it is correct for the government to regulate animal welfare. This should be done to protect the animals from suffering unnecessarily, whilst still allowing humans to consume products made from animals in a way that does not cause them undue suffering. This should be done to preserve the livelihood of millions of people across the country that rely on these products for income and to preserve the health of the general population. We are unsure how the government would be able to
4: 1,3,2,4
1: 4,1,2,3